ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Rethinking Osteoporosis Drugs: Can We Simultaneously Address Sarcopenia?
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of Functional Performance, Bone Mineral Density, and Back Pain Under Specific Pharmacological Osteoporosis Therapy in an Elderly, Multimorbid Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A distinct serum metabolic profile characterizes osteosarcopenia: identifying potential metabolic biomarkers.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- PBX1 promotes osteoporosis by upregulating HMGB1 to suppress osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Nandrolone Decanoate for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteoporosis and sarcopenia are two aspects of the geriatric syndrome that frequently occur together and affect one another in a condition referred to as osteosarcopenia. Preventive and treatment options for osteosarcopenia exist but are mainly focused on the treatment of osteoporosis, as there is still no FDA-approved treatment for sarcopenia. Drugs for osteoporosis include antiresorptive and anabolic drugs and hormonal replacement therapies and are prescribed based on age, BMD and other patient characteristics, which, however, do not include the possible co-existence of sarcopenia. As several studies and clinical trials have shown that the pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis can also affect muscle tissue, in either a positive or negative manner, sarcopenia should be another factor affecting the choice of treatment, especially when facing equal treatment options for osteoporosis. The aim of this review was to summarize our current knowledge on the effects of FDA-approved drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis on muscle quality, mass and function. A better understanding of the effects that certain drugs have on muscle tissue might in the future help us to simultaneously at least partially also address the wasting of muscle tissue and avoid further pharmacologically induced decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.