Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40725168›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Rethinking Osteoporosis Drugs: Can We Simultaneously Address Sarcopenia?

Zoran Gavrilov, Jasna Lojk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zoran GavrilovLab for Retinal Gene Therapy, Department Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Wagistrasse 14, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland.
Jasna LojkDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva cesta 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency J3- 4527The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency P3-0298University Medical Centre Ljubljana Tertiary project No. 20230079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis and sarcopenia are two aspects of the geriatric syndrome that frequently occur together and affect one another in a condition referred to as osteosarcopenia. Preventive and treatment options for osteosarcopenia exist but are mainly focused on the treatment of osteoporosis, as there is still no FDA-approved treatment for sarcopenia. Drugs for osteoporosis include antiresorptive and anabolic drugs and hormonal replacement therapies and are prescribed based on age, BMD and other patient characteristics, which, however, do not include the possible co-existence of sarcopenia. As several studies and clinical trials have shown that the pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis can also affect muscle tissue, in either a positive or negative manner, sarcopenia should be another factor affecting the choice of treatment, especially when facing equal treatment options for osteoporosis. The aim of this review was to summarize our current knowledge on the effects of FDA-approved drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis on muscle quality, mass and function. A better understanding of the effects that certain drugs have on muscle tissue might in the future help us to simultaneously at least partially also address the wasting of muscle tissue and avoid further pharmacologically induced decline.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsOsteoporosisSarcopeniaAnabolic AgentsAnimalsBone DensityHumansMuscle, SkeletalAnabolic AgentsBone Density Conservation Agentsosteoporosisosteosarcopeniapharmacological treatmentsarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID40725168
PMCPMC12294977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.