ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Identifying Cortical Molecular Biomarkers Potentially Associated with Learning in Mice Using Artificial Intelligence.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender effects and racial biases in mate selection as revealed by machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Machine Learning and Feature Selection in Pediatric Appendicitis.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we identify cortical molecular biomarkers potentially associated with learning in mice using artificial intelligence (AI), inclusive of established and novel feature selection combined with supervised learning technologies. We applied multiple machine learning (ML) algorithms, using public domain ML software, to a public domain dataset, in order to support reproducible findings. We developed technologies tasked with predicting whether a given mouse was shocked to learn, based on protein expression levels extracted from their cortices. Results indicate that it is possible to predict whether a mouse has been shocked to learn or not based only on the following cortical molecular biomarkers: brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), NR2A subunit of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor, B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2), histone H3 acetylation at lysine 18 (H3AcK18), protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (pERK), and superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1). These results were obtained with a novel redundancy-aware feature selection method. Five out of six protein expression biomarkers (BDNF, NR2A, H3AcK18, pERK, SOD1) identified have previously been associated with aspects of learning in the literature. Three of the proteins (BDNF, NR2A, and BCL2) have previously been associated with pruning, and one has previously been associated with apoptosis (BCL2), implying a potential connection between learning and both cortical pruning and apoptosis. The results imply that these six protein expression profiles (BDNF, NR2A, BCL2, H3AcK18, pERK, SOD1) are highly predictive of whether or not a mouse has been shocked to learn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.