Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40725122›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

MEK Inhibition in Glioblastoma: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.

Adam Shapira Levy, Jean-Paul Bryant, David Matichak, Shumpei Onishi, Yeshavanth Kumar Banasavadi-Siddegowda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam Shapira LevyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33176, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7582-0877
Jean-Paul BryantDepartment of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
David MatichakDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
Shumpei OnishiSurgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4156-6540
Yeshavanth Kumar Banasavadi-SiddegowdaSurgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4730-6918

Funding

Supported by Intramural Research Program at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke at the NIH Supported by Intramural Research Program at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke at the NIH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) protein family has dual-specificity protein kinases with a myriad of cellular functions that include but are not limited to cell survival, cell division, immunologic response, angiogenesis, and cellular senescence. MEK is crucial in the MAPK signaling pathway, regulating different organ systems, including the CNS. Increased activation and dysregulation of the MEK pathway is reportedly observed in 30% of all malignancies. The diversity of MEK renders it a prime target for inhibition in treating cancer. MEK inhibition has been studied in the context of melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and colorectal cancer, among others. The standard treatment for glioblastoma (resection, temozolomide, and radiation) remains relatively futile, which warrants alternative treatment options. Therefore, MEK inhibition has garnered more attention in recent years as investigators have explored its role in treating the most aggressive and most common primary brain tumor, glioblastoma. MEK inhibitors have shown efficacy in pre-clinical investigations as well as some promise in clinical trials which have demonstrated improved overall and progression-free survival. This underscores the potential of MEK inhibition in glioblastoma therapy and represents an area that likely warrants further research. However, there are few comprehensive and unifying reviews discussing the current state of MEK inhibition in glioblastoma therapy. We begin this review by detailing the normal function of MEK as it pertains to the CNS. We then compiled relevant pre-clinical and clinical studies to investigate recent research discussing the role of MEK inhibition in glioblastoma therapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsAnimalsHumansMAP Kinase Signaling SystemAntineoplastic AgentsMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsclinicalglioblastomaMEKpreclinicaltrametinib

Identifiers

PMID40725122
PMCPMC12295435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.