SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
The Efficacy of Polatuzumab Vedotin Targeting CD79B in the Treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polatuzumab vedotin (PoV) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate that targets CD79B for the treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PoV in patients with NHL. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials evaluating PoV in NHL were conducted. The primary outcomes were complete response (CR) rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety outcomes were also assessed. Random-effects models were used for the pooled analyses. Thirteen studies with 1533 patients with NHL were included. PoV significantly improved CR rates compared to control treatments (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.01-2.21,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.