Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40725061›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

The Latest Advances in Omics Technology for Assessing Tissue Damage: Implications for the Study of Sudden Cardiac Death.

Raluca-Maria Căținaș, Sorin Hostiuc

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Raluca-Maria CăținașDepartment of Legal Medicine and Bioethics, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Sorin HostiucDepartment of Legal Medicine and Bioethics, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4130-9402

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a major public health concern, being a leading cause of death worldwide. SCD is particularly alarming for individuals with apparently good health, as it often occurs without preceding warning signs. Unfortunately, traditional autopsy methods frequently fail to identify the precise cause of death in these cases, highlighting the need for advanced techniques to elucidate underlying mechanisms. Recent advances in molecular biology over the past few years, particularly in proteomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics techniques, have led to an expanded understanding of gene expression, protein activity, and metabolic changes, offering valuable insights into fatal cardiac events. Combining multi-omics methods with bioinformatics and machine learning algorithms significantly enhances our ability to uncover the processes behind lethal cardiac dysfunctions by identifying new useful biomarkers (like cardiac myosin-binding protein C, acylcarnitines, or microRNAs) to reveal molecular pathways linked to SCD. This narrative review summarizes the role of multi-omics approaches in forensic diagnosis by exploring current applications in unexplained cases and the benefits of integrating merged techniques in otherwise negative autopsies. We also discuss the potential for developing personalized and preventive forensic medicine, the technical limitations of currently available methods, and the ethical considerations arising from these advancements.

Indexed as

Death, Sudden, CardiacMetabolomicsProteomicsAutopsyBiomarkersComputational BiologyGenomicsHumansMachine LearningTranscriptomeBiomarkersforensic sciencemetabolomicsproteomicssudden cardiac deathtranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID40725061
PMCPMC12295138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.