ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
DNA-Barcoding for Cultivar Identification and Intraspecific Diversity Analysis of Agricultural Crops.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primer-Less Species Identification Throughout Fungal (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Complete chloroplast genome of Triticum aestivum cultivar 'Keumkang' from Korea (Poaceae) and comparative chloroplast genomes of the members of the Triticum genus.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026Article
- A PCA-random forest pipeline for high-resolution SNP-based cultivar discrimination in Leymus chinensis.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Rapid Authentication of Flowers ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Intraspecific identification of Actinidia eriantha Benth. based on chloroplast genes.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA barcoding of intraspecific diversity of agricultural crops is important to develop the genetic passports of valuable genotypes and cultivars. The advantage of DNA-barcoding as compared to traditional genotyping of cultivars is that the procedure can be unified and applied for the broad range of accessions. This not only makes it cost efficient, but also allows to develop open access genetic databases to accumulate information of the world's germplasm collections of different crops. In this regard, the aim of the review was to analyze the latest research in this field, including the selection of loci, universal primers, strategies of amplicons analysis, bioinformatic tools, and the development of databases. We reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of each strategy with the focus of cultivars identification. The data indicates that following chloroplast loci are the most prominent for the intraspecific diversity analysis: (trnE-UUC/trnT-GUU, rpl23/rpl2.l, psbA-trnH, trnL-trnF, trnK, rpoC1, ycf1-a, rpl32-trnL, trnH-psbA and matK). We suggest that the combination of three or four of these loci can be a sufficient DNA barcode for cultivar-level identification. This combination has to be selected for each crop. Advantages and disadvantages of different approaches of amplicons analysis are discussed. The bioinformatic tools and databases for the plant barcoding are reviewed. This review will be useful for selecting appropriate strategies for barcoding of intraspecific diversity of agricultural crops to develop genetic passports of valuable cultivars in germplasm collections worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.