ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Quantum Dot-Based Luminescent Sensors: Review from Analytical Perspective.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Excitonic and Optical Transduction Mechanisms in Quantum Dot Sensors for Environmental Pollutant Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Triadic Mn-ZnS/MOF/MIP Fluorescent Sensor for Highly Sensitive and Selective Sulfathiazole Detection.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Carbon Quantum Dot-Based Sensors: Photochemical Principles and Multimodal Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Applications of Nanobiotechnology in Medicine.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comprehensive advances in CsPbBrNanoscale advances · 2026Review
- Advances in Coumarin Fluorescent Probes for Medical Diagnostics: A Review of Recent Developments.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Integration of Nanotechnology with ctDNA: New Advances for Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantum Dots (QDs) are small semiconductor nanoparticles (<10 nm) with strong, relatively stable, and tunable luminescent properties, which are increasingly applied in the sensing and detection of various analytes, including metal ions, biomarkers, explosives, proteins, RNA/DNA fragments, pesticides, drugs, and pollutants. In this review, we critically assess recent developments and advancements in luminescent QD-based sensors from an analytical perspective. We collected, tabulated, and analyzed relevant data reported in 124 peer-reviewed articles. The key analytical figures of merit, including the limit of detection (LOD), excitation and emission wavelengths, and size of the particles were extracted, tabulated, and analyzed with graphical representations. We calculated the geometric mean and median LODs from those tabulated publications. We found the following geometric mean LODs: 38 nM for QD-fluorescent-based sensors, 26 nM for QD-phosphorescent-based sensors, and an impressively low 0.109 pM for QD-chemiluminescent-based sensors, which demonstrate by far the best sensitivity in QD-based detection. Moreover, AI-based sensing methods, including the ATTBeadNet model, optimized principal component analysis(OPCA) model, and Support Vector Machine (SVM)-based system, were reviewed as they enhance the analytical performance of the detection. Despite these advances, there are still challenges that include improvements in recovery values, biocompatibility, stability, and overall performance. This review highlights trends to guide the future design of robust, high-performance, QD-based luminescent sensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.