ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Structural Characterization of Micronized Lignocellulose Date Pits as Affected by Water Sonication Followed by Alcoholic Fractionations.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Date pits are considered waste, and micronized date pit powder could be developed for use in foods and bio-products. In this study, micronized date pit powders were extracted by alcoholic sedimentation after ultrasound treatment. The control was considered untreated, i.e., without sonication. Six micronized fractions (i.e., three from control and three from treated) were prepared by three stages of alcoholic sedimentation. In the case of untreated date pit powder, the average particle size of the fractionated date pit powder (i.e., residue) from three stages of alcoholic sedimentation varied from 89 to 164 µm, while ultrasonic treatment showed variation from 39 to 65 µm. The average particle size of the supernatant fractions of untreated date pit powder varied from 22 to 63 µm, while ultrasonic treatment showed variation from 18 to 44 µm. Ultrasound treatment produced smaller particles. In all cases, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) showed that supernatant fractions contained lumped particles compared to the residue fractions. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) showed the presence of nanoparticles in all extracted fractions. Two glass transitions were observed in all fractions except for the residue from the first sedimentation stage. In addition, higher levels of degradation in the fractionated date pits could be achieved by ultrasonic treatment, as is evident from the Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.