Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40724861›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Mitochondrial DNA Copy Numbers and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Manuela Chiavarini, Jacopo Dolcini, Giorgio Firmani, Kasey J M Brennan, Andrès Cardenas, Andrea A Baccarelli, Pamela Barbadoro

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mitochondrial DNA Breaks and Copy Number and the Risk of Lung Cancer in the Shanghai Women's Health Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manuela ChiavariniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3551-7486
Jacopo DolciniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, 60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5250-1833
Giorgio FirmaniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, 60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-7797-1170
Kasey J M BrennanDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Andrès CardenasDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA.
Andrea A BaccarelliDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Pamela BarbadoroDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, 60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1495-0165

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

LC continues to be the leading cause of cancer mortality globally, among both males and females, representing a major public health challenge. The impact of mitochondria on human health and disease is a rapidly growing focus in scientific research, due to their critical roles in cellular survival and death. Mitochondria play an important role in controlling imperative cellular parameters, and alterations in mtDNAcn might be crucial for LC development. MtDNAcn has been studied as a possible marker for LC risk, but its role in prevention is still unclear. This review and meta-analysis aims to summarize the current evidence and provide an overall estimate of the relationship between the mtDNA copy number in human samples like blood and sputum. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were used for studies published up to February 2024, following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Studies were combined using a random-effects model, and we assessed the heterogeneity between studies with the chi-square-based Cochran's Q statistic and the I

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsDNA, MitochondrialLung NeoplasmsFemaleHumansDNA, Mitochondrialbloodlung cancermeta-analysismitochondrial DNApublic healthsputumsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40724861
PMCPMC12294451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.