ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Chemosensory Receptors in Vertebrates: Structure and Computational Modeling Insights.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemical communication is based on the release of chemical cues, including odorants, tastants and semiochemicals, which can be perceived by animals and trigger physiological and behavioral responses. These compounds exhibit a wide size and properties range, spanning from small volatile molecules to soluble proteins, and are perceived by various chemosensory receptors (CRs). The structure of these receptors is very well conserved across all organisms and within the family to which they belong, the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family. It is characterized by highly conserved seven-transmembrane (7TM) α-helices. However, the characteristics of these proteins and the methods used to study their structures are limiting factors for resolving their structures. Due to the importance of CRs-especially olfactory and taste receptors, responsible for two of our five basic senses-alternative methods are utilized to overcome these structural challenges. Indeed, in silico structural biology is an expanding field that is very useful for CR structural studies. Since the 1960s, many algorithms have been developed and improved in an attempt to resolve protein structure. We review the current knowledge regarding different vertebrate CRs in this study, with an emphasis on the in silico structural methods employed to improve our understanding of CR structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.