ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Technological Advances in Healthcare and Medical Deontology: Towards a Hybrid Clinical Methodology.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Professional Competencies and Job Satisfaction Among Physiotherapists: Validation and Psychometric Analysis of the Multidimensional Scale.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid advancements in healthcare technologies are reshaping the medical landscape, prompting a reconsideration of clinical methodologies and their ethical foundations. This article explores the need for an updated approach to medical deontology, emphasizing the transition from traditional practices to a hybrid clinical methodology that integrates both human expertise and technological innovations. With the increasing use of Artificial Intelligence, data analytics, and advanced medical tools, healthcare professionals are presented with new ethical and professional challenges. These challenges demand a reevaluation of professional responsibility, highlighting the importance of scientific evidence in decision-making while mitigating the influence of economic and ideological factors. By framing medical practice within a systemic and integrated perspective, this article proposes a model that moves beyond the reductionist and anti-reductionist dualism, fostering a more realistic understanding of healthcare. This new paradigm necessitates the evolution of the Medical Code of Ethics, integrating the concept of "medical intelligence" to address the complexities of data management and its ethical implications. The article ultimately advocates for a dynamic and adaptive approach that aligns medical practice with emerging technologies, ensuring that patient care remains person-centered and ethically grounded in a rapidly changing healthcare environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.