ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
OpenFungi: A Machine Learning Dataset for Fungal Image Recognition Tasks.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A key aspect driving advancements in machine learning applications in medicine is the availability of publicly accessible datasets. Evidently, there are studies conducted in the past with promising results, but they are not reproducible due to the fact that the data used are closed or proprietary or the authors were not able to publish them. The current study aims to narrow this gap for researchers who focus on image recognition tasks in microbiology, specifically in fungal identification and classification. An open database named OpenFungi is made available in this work; it contains high-quality images of macroscopic and microscopic fungal genera. The fungal cultures were grown from food products such as green leaf spices and cereals. The quality of the dataset is demonstrated by solving a classification problem with a simple convolutional neural network. A thorough experimental analysis was conducted, where six performance metrics were measured in three distinct validation scenarios. The results obtained demonstrate that in the fungal species classification task, the model achieved an overall accuracy of 99.79%, a true-positive rate of 99.55%, a true-negative rate of 99.96%, and an F1 score of 99.63% on the macroscopic dataset. On the microscopic dataset, the model reached a 97.82% accuracy, a 94.89% true-positive rate, a 99.19% true-negative rate, and a 95.20% F1 score. The results also reveal that the model maintains promising performance even when trained on smaller datasets, highlighting its robustness and generalization capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.