ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Which Is More Valuable in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Thromboembolism? The Wells Score, the Revised Geneva Score, or the Padua Score?
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Evolving Landscape of Pulmonary Vascular Disease: Current Advances and Future Directions in Pulmonary Hypertension and Pulmonary Embolism.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is a preventable yet potentially fatal condition with significant morbidity and mortality. Several clinical scoring systems, including the Wells and modified Geneva scores, have been developed to assess the likelihood of PTE and guide further diagnostic evaluation. The Padua prediction score, primarily used to assess venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in hospitalized patients, has also been considered for its potential utility in suspected PTE cases.
methodsThis retrospective study included 257 patients with suspected acute PTE. Diagnosis was confirmed by computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in 140 patients (patient group), while 117 patients without radiologic evidence of PTE served as controls. All participants were evaluated using Wells, modified Geneva, and Padua scores. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the effect of combining scores with age-adjusted D-dimer levels were analyzed.
resultsThe Wells score demonstrated a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 91%, with a positive predictive value of 88%. Modified Geneva and Padua scores showed lower diagnostic accuracy. Negative predictive values increased significantly when combined with age adjusted D-dimer levels.
conclusionsThe Wells score was the most reliable tool among the three for predicting PTE. Combining clinical scoring with D-dimer testing enhances diagnostic accuracy and may reduce unnecessary imaging in patients with low to moderate risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.