ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Predicting ICU Delirium in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients Using Demographic, Clinical, and Laboratory Admission Data: A Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Delirium is a common and underrecognized complication among critically ill patients, associated with prolonged ICU stays, cognitive dysfunction, and increased mortality. Its multifactorial causes and fluctuating course hinder early prediction, limiting timely management. Predictive models based on data available at ICU admission may help to identify high-risk patients and guide early interventions. This study evaluated machine learning models used to predict delirium in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections using a prospective cohort of 426 patients. The dataset included demographic characteristics, clinical data (e.g., comorbidities, medication, reason for ICU admission, interventions), and routine lab test results. Five models-Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Naïve Bayes-were developed using 112 features. Feature selection relied on Information Gain, and model performance was assessed via 10-fold cross-validation. The Naïve Bayes model showed moderate predictive performance and high interpretability, achieving an AUC of 0.717, accuracy of 65.3%, sensitivity of 62.4%, specificity of 68.1%, and precision of 66.2%. Key predictors included invasive mechanical ventilation, deep sedation with benzodiazepines, SARS-CoV-2 as the reason for ICU admission, ECMO use, constipation, and male sex. These findings support the use of interpretable models for early delirium risk stratification using routinely available ICU data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.