ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Forecasting with a Bivariate Hysteretic Time Series Model Incorporating Asymmetric Volatility and Dynamic Correlations.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores asymmetric volatility structures within multivariate hysteretic autoregressive (MHAR) models that incorporate conditional correlations, aiming to flexibly capture the dynamic behavior of global financial assets. The proposed framework integrates regime switching and time-varying delays governed by a hysteresis variable, enabling the model to account for both asymmetric volatility and evolving correlation patterns over time. We adopt a fully Bayesian inference approach using adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques, allowing for the joint estimation of model parameters, Value-at-Risk (VaR), and Marginal Expected Shortfall (MES). The accuracy of VaR forecasts is assessed through two standard backtesting procedures. Our empirical analysis involves both simulated data and real-world financial datasets to evaluate the model's effectiveness in capturing downside risk dynamics. We demonstrate the application of the proposed method on three pairs of daily log returns involving the S&P500, Bank of America (BAC), Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), and Goldman Sachs (GS), present the results obtained, and compare them against the original model framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.