ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Entropy-Regularized Attention for Explainable Histological Classification with Convolutional and Hybrid Models.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning models such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and vision transformers (ViTs) perform well in histological image classification, but often lack interpretability. We introduce a unified framework that adds an attention branch and CAM Fostering, an entropy-based regularizer, to improve Grad-CAM visualizations. Six backbone architectures (ResNet-50, DenseNet-201, EfficientNet-b0, ResNeXt-50, ConvNeXt, CoatNet-small) were trained, with and without our modifications, on five H&E-stained datasets. We measured explanation quality using coherence, complexity, confidence drop, and their harmonic mean (ADCC). Our method increased the ADCC in five of the six backbones; ResNet-50 saw the largest gain (+15.65%), and CoatNet-small achieved the highest overall score (+2.69%), peaking at 77.90% on the non-Hodgkin lymphoma set. The classification accuracy remained stable or improved in four models. These results show that combining attention and entropy produces clearer, more informative heatmaps without degrading performance. Our contributions include a modular architecture for both convolutional and hybrid models and a comprehensive, quantitative explainability evaluation suite.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.