ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Research on the Tail Risk Spillover Effect of Cryptocurrencies and Energy Market Based on Complex Network.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Impact of Digital Currency Innovation: Risk Spillover Effects Between the Cryptocurrency and Traditional Financial Markets.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the relationship between cryptocurrency mining activities and electricity consumption becomes increasingly close, the risk spillover effect is steadily drawing a lot of attention to the energy and cryptocurrency markets. For the purpose of studying the risk contagion between the cryptocurrency and energy market, this paper constructs a risk contagion network between cryptocurrency and China's energy market using complex network methods. The tail risk spillover effects under various time and frequency domains were captured by the spillover index, which was assessed by the leptokurtic quantile vector autoregression (QVAR) model. Considering the spatial heterogeneity of energy companies, the spatial Durbin model was used to explore the impact mechanism of risk spillovers. The research showed that the framework of this paper more accurately reflects the tail risk spillover effect between China's energy market and cryptocurrency market under various shock scales, with the extreme state experiencing a much higher spillover effect than the normal state. Furthermore, this study found that the tail risk contagion between cryptocurrency and China's energy market exhibits notable dynamic variation and cyclical features, and the long-term risk spillover effect is primarily responsible for the total spillover. At the same time, the study found that the company with the most significant spillover effect does not necessarily have the largest company size, and other factors, such as geographical location and business composition, need to be considered. Moreover, there are spatial spillover effects among listed energy companies, and the connectedness between cryptocurrency and the energy market network generates an obvious impact on risk spillover effects. The research conclusions have an important role in preventing cross-contagion of risks between cryptocurrency and the energy market.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.