ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Quantification and Evolution of Online Public Opinion Heat Considering Interactive Behavior and Emotional Conflict.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid development of the Internet, the speed and scope of sudden public events disseminating in cyberspace have grown significantly. Current methods of quantifying public opinion heat often neglect emotion-driven factors and user interaction behaviors, making it difficult to accurately capture fluctuations during dissemination. To address these issues, first, this study addressed the complexity of interaction behaviors by introducing an approach that employs the information gain ratio as a weighting indicator to measure the "interaction heat" contributed by different interaction attributes during event evolution. Second, this study built on SnowNLP and expanded textual features to conduct in-depth sentiment mining of large-scale opinion texts, defining the variance of netizens' emotional tendencies as an indicator of emotional fluctuations, thereby capturing "emotional heat". We then integrated interactive behavior and emotional conflict assessment to achieve comprehensive heat index to quantification and dynamic evolution analysis of online public opinion heat. Subsequently, we used Hodrick-Prescott filter to separate long-term trends and short-term fluctuations, extract six key quantitative features (number of peaks, time of first peak, maximum amplitude, decay time, peak emotional conflict, and overall duration), and applied K-means clustering algorithm (K-means) to classify events into three propagation patterns, which are extreme burst, normal burst, and long-tail. Finally, this study conducted ablation experiments on critical external intervention nodes to quantify the distinct contribution of each intervention to the propagation trend by observing changes in the model's goodness-of-fit (R2) after removing different interventions. Through an empirical analysis of six representative public opinion events from 2024, this study verified the effectiveness of the proposed framework and uncovered critical characteristics of opinion dissemination, including explosiveness versus persistence, multi-round dissemination with recurring emotional fluctuations, and the interplay of multiple driving factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.