ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Decoding the Molecular Mechanisms of Menthol Isomer Perception Based on Computational Simulations.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding the Flavor Code of Fresh and DriedFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A sensory-computational framework to decipher and predict binary aroma interactions: A case study of furaneol with five Co-odorants.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The flavor characteristics, perception, and molecular mechanisms of eight menthol isomers were investigated by sensory analysis combined with computational simulations. The sensory analysis results show significant differences in the odor profiles of the different menthol isomers. Among them, L-menthol shows a pleasant, sweet, and mint-like odor with a distinct freshness and no off-flavors, whereas the remaining seven isomers were interspersed with negative odors (musty, herbal, or earthy aromas). L-menthol and D-menthol had the lowest detection thresholds of 5.166 and 4.734 mg/L, respectively. The molecular docking results of the menthol isomers with olfactory receptors (Olfr874, OR8B8, and OR8B12) indicate that hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions were the key binding forces. The binding energy ranged from -7.3 to -5.1 kcal/mol. Residues His-55 (Olfr874), Thr-56 (Olfr874), Leu-55 (OR8B8), Tyr-94 (OR8B8), Thr-57 (OR8B8), Phe-199 (OR8B12), and Ser-248 (OR8B12) with high frequencies particularly contributed to the recognition of menthol isomers. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the olfactory perception mechanism of menthol and provide data support for the development and precise application of minty odorants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.