Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40724281›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

EEG-Based Analysis of Neural Responses to Sweeteners: Effects of Type and Concentration.

Xiaolei Wang, Guangnan Wang, Donghong Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaolei WangCollege of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Guangnan WangCollege of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Donghong LiuCollege of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sweetness is a key dimension of sensory experience in food, and variations in the type and concentration of sweeteners can elicit distinct brain responses. In this study, electroencephalography (EEG) was employed to systematically evaluate neural activity elicited by different concentrations of sucrose solutions (1%, 3%, 5%, and 7%) and by non-nutritive sweeteners matched in perceived sweetness to a 7% sucrose solution (10% erythritol, 0.0133% sucralose, and 0.0368% stevioside). The results revealed that an increased sucrose concentration was associated with progressively weaker EEG signal intensity, suggesting that the brain can effectively distinguish sweetness intensity. Under iso-sweet conditions, different types of sweeteners induced significantly distinct EEG patterns, indicating that the nature of the sweetener modulates flavor perception at the neural level. Further analysis showed increases in both δ- and α-band power following sweet taste stimulation, with prominent activations observed in the frontal, parietal, and right temporal regions. These findings demonstrate the utility of EEG in detecting subtle differences in brain responses to sweeteners, offering new insights into the neural mechanisms underlying sweet taste perception.

Indexed as

brain responsenon-nutritive sweetenersscalp electroencephalogramsweetenerstaste

Identifiers

PMID40724281
PMCPMC12294438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.