Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40724248›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Consumer Acceptance of Alternative Proteins: Exploring Determinants of the Consumer Willingness to Buy in Germany.

Madita Amoneit, Leon Gellrich, Dagmara M Weckowska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Madita AmoneitSchool of Business and Economics, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0902-7352
Leon GellrichSchool of Business and Economics, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Dagmara M WeckowskaSchool of Business and Economics, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8911-3583

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research 031B0730H
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Western countries, a shift to a diet rich in proteins from diverse sources could aid the transition to more sustainable patterns of protein consumption and production, contributing to meet the future demand for protein from the growing population. The successful integration of alternative proteins into diets hinges, however, on consumer acceptance. Despite a plethora of acceptance studies on alternative proteins, comparative insights remain limited. To improve the fragmented understanding of the drivers and barriers of alternative protein acceptance, this study examines consumer willingness in Germany to buy food products containing proteins from three sources-algae, crickets and jellyfish-using the same methodological approach. The findings indicate that environmental consciousness strengthens the willingness to buy products based on all three protein sources while neophobia weakens it. In contrast, past meat consumption habits contribute positively to the acceptance of animal-origin alternative proteins, like crickets and jellyfish, but negatively to the acceptance of algae. The acceptance is also influenced by demographic factors. It is argued that strategies targeting these factors can enhance the acceptance of alternative protein sources such as algae, crickets and jellyfish. However, it is important to tailor the strategies to the determinants that influence the willingness to buy products from a particular protein source.

Indexed as

algaealternative protein sourcesconsumer acceptancecricketsjellyfishprotein transitionwillingness to buy

Identifiers

PMID40724248
PMCPMC12294508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.