Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40724139›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Ex-Vapers' Perspectives on Helpful and Unhelpful Influences During Their Quit Journeys.

Mohammed Al-Hamdani, Courtney McKay, Katelynn Carter-Rogers, Steven Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammed Al-HamdaniDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Science, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-2527-4492
Courtney McKayDepartment of Psychology, Saint Mary's University, 923 Robie Street, Halifax, NS B3H 3C3, Canada.
Katelynn Carter-RogersDepartment of Management, St. Francis Xavier University, 4130 University Ave, Antigonish, NS B2G 2W5, Canada.
Steven SmithDepartment of Psychology, Saint Mary's University, 923 Robie Street, Halifax, NS B3H 3C3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1103-0144

Funding

Nova Scotia Department of Health and Wellness n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is limited understanding of what influences vaping cessation, especially as vaping regulations change, and different jurisdictions have different regulations. This study involves 281 ex-vapers (16-24 years) from Nova Scotia, Canada. A content analysis was used to understand and compare youth and young adults' (YA) experiences of quitting vaping. Both helpful and unhelpful factors for quitting vaping were identified; each category had five themes and twenty-one sub-themes. Helpful factors were consistent across both age categories and included planned and unplanned vaping control interventions, health concerns, social support, evidence-based support, and unassisted quitting methods. Similarly, the five themes identified as unhelpful factors were consistent for both age groups: negative personal implications, negative social influences, planned and unplanned vaping control interventions, the side effects of previous use, and simultaneous and alternative substance use. Policies that limit access and raise awareness about lung health and well-being can help youth quit vaping. For YAs, increasing awareness about social support and health concerns is crucial. Raising e-cigarette costs and reducing vaping normalization supports quitting for YAs. Stress reduction and training to handle social pressure could aid youth, while YAs might benefit from treatment for other substance use to help with nicotine quitting.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationVapingAdolescentElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansMaleNova ScotiaSocial SupportYoung Adultex-vaperspolicy changequitting behaviorsvaping cessation

Identifiers

PMID40724139
PMCPMC12294330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.