ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Moral Injury Among Medical Personnel and First Responders Across Different Healthcare and Emergency Response Settings: A Narrative Review.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparing the molecular correlates of PTSD in first responders and the broader molecular PTSD literature: a hybrid review.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms and Dissociation in Emergency Medical Service Personnel.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Moral injury severity profiles and their pathways to negative emotions in medical staff: the differential mediating role of emotion regulation.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- We are still in it: a conceptual model for moral injury and burnout in alternative response programs to guide intervention.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Burnout and Moral Injury in Healthcare Workers: An Observational Study in a Romanian Chronic Care Hospital.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The positive effect of perceived social support and moral resilience between moral injury and health-related productivity loss among emergency nurses.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Moral injury is increasingly recognized as a significant concern among medical personnel and first responders, particularly in high-stress healthcare and emergency settings. This review aims to synthesize current evidence on the prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of moral injury among medical personnel and first responders across diverse healthcare and emergency response environments. We included peer-reviewed studies reporting on moral injury among medical personnel or first responders in any healthcare or emergency response setting, excluding studies that did not report original data or focused solely on military populations. We systematically searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Central, up to April 2025. Risk of bias was assessed directly from the manuscripts. Data were synthesized narratively and, where possible, pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. A total of 41 studies involving 14,500 participants were included. The prevalence of moral injury ranged from 4.1% to 69.44% across settings. Key risk factors identified included exposure to traumatic events, organizational constraints, and lack of support. Meta-analysis indicated a significant association between moral injury and symptoms of PTSD. The evidence is limited by heterogeneity in measurement tools and study designs, as well as a moderate risk of bias in several included studies. In conclusion, moral injury is prevalent among medical personnel and first responders, with important implications for mental health interventions and organizational policy. This review was not funded externally, and is registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251019492).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.