ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Success Metrics for Hepatitis C Elimination Among People Who Inject Drugs: A Scoping Review of Indicators in Harm Reduction.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to identify and synthesize the success metrics used to assess hepatitis C elimination among people who inject drugs (PWID) through harm reduction strategies. A scoping review was performed by searching across three databases to identify systematic reviews that discussed hepatitis C in PWID within the context of harm reduction. The studies were then analyzed for success metrics used to describe hepatitis C in PWID. The indicators used were prevalence, incidence, screening, treatment uptake, treatment completion, and sustained virologic response. A total of fourteen systematic reviews were included. The most frequently reported indicators were prevalence and incidence, addressed in eight/seven systematic reviews, respectively. In contrast, screening, treatment uptake, and treatment completion were less commonly reported, with only two reviews addressing screening and treatment uptake, and a single review reporting treatment completion. Similarly, sustained virologic response (SVR) was reported in only two systematic reviews. Seven additional indicators were reported. Prevalence and incidence are the dominantly used HCV indicators, while others are often neglected. Inconsistencies in measurements and reporting can be found for all indicators. This study reports a gap regarding indicators beyond prevalence and incidence, inconsistent measurement approaches, and a lack of standardized frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.