Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40724046›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Locating Meaning: Health Professionals' Views on the Psychological and Clinical Significance of Self-Injury Sites.

Kathryn Jane Gardner, Rachel Smith, Gillian Rayner, Gary Lamph, Lucie Moores, Robyn Crossan, Laura Bisland, Nicky Danino, Peter Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kathryn Jane GardnerSchool of Psychology and Humanities, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3904-1638
Rachel SmithSchool of Psychology and Humanities, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.
Gillian RaynerSchool of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.
Gary LamphSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4099-2812
Lucie MooresSchool of Psychology and Humanities, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.
Robyn CrossanSchool of Psychology and Humanities, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.
Laura BislandSchool of Psychology and Humanities, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.
Nicky DaninoSchool of Computer Science, Leeds Trinity University, Leeds LS18 5HD, UK.
Peter TaylorDivision of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study explored how health professionals construct clinical and psychological meaning based on the location of self-injury on the body, particularly in relation to concealed or visible injuries and how they might inform attributions about risk, self-injury functions, and distress.

methodsThis study used qualitative thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 19 health professionals with experience working with self-injury, exploring perceptions and attributions about self-injury in different body locations.

resultsSeven themes emerged. In some cases, staff's attributions aligned with the findings from studies of those who self-injure, such as injuries to areas such as the neck are higher risk. Location was one factor among others, such as injury severity, that staff considered when assessing the risk of infection or suicide. Staff often viewed visible injuries as less risky and attributed them to interpersonal communicative functions, and concealed injuries to intrapersonal factors, though not all staff shared these perspectives. Some staff considered other potential drivers of injury location, including past experiences such as trauma, demographic factors, mental health diagnoses, and exposure to social influences. Some staff described the practical determinants of injury location, such as ease of access, and considered the impact of self-injury location on themselves and their colleagues.

conclusionsInjury location can influence staff perceptions of risk, self-injury functions and distress, underscoring the need for individualized assessment and formulation of each self-injury episode to ensure appropriate risk management. Staff training should be adapted to address injury location to improve understanding, raise awareness of related attributions, and enhance the development of clinical skills. Organizations should support staff in their role due to the potential emotional impact of working with individuals who self-injure and are at risk of suicide. Future research should investigate whether location-based attributions are associated with unintended clinical consequences, such as inaccuracies in risk assessment and formulation.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelSelf-Injurious BehaviorAdultClinical RelevanceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedbodydistressfunctionslocationriskself-harmself-injurysuicide

Identifiers

PMID40724046
PMCPMC12294794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.