ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comparative Effects of Intermittent vs. Constant Ceftiofur Hydrochloride Exposure on
Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesCeftiofur hydrochloride (CEF) is a third-generation cephalosporin widely used in cattle to treat various disease. The recommended dosage was 1.1 to 2.2 mg/kg BW for 3 to 5 consecutive days by intramuscular or subcutaneous injection. Incomplete treatment, overuse, or misuse, often observed in clinical practice, are major contributors to resistance development. This study aims to explore how different concentrations, durations, and dosing frequencies affect susceptibility and bactericidal efficacy of
methodsFirst, CEF was intermittently administered at 1/2 × minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), 2 × MIC, 6 × MIC, and 100 × MIC for 30 cycles. Second, CEF was continuously administered for 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 h. Bacterial susceptibility, regrowth, survival rate, and the emergence of persisters or tolerant phenotypes were assessed. Genetic mutations were identified by whole-genome resequencing. Membrane permeability, integrity, and efflux pump activity were analyzed to elucidate the mechanism of CEF.
resultsAfter 30 cycles, the MIC increased eight-fold in the 2 × MIC group. No significant MIC increase was found in other groups, but a progression from susceptibility to persistence and then to tolerance was observed in the 100 × MIC intermittent group. The survival rate increased both in the 2 × MIC and 100 × MIC groups. With continuous exposure to ≥6 × MIC over 120 h, strains were completely eradicated without MIC increase. Resistance-associated single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) mutations were detected only in strains of the 2 × MIC and 100 × MIC intermittent groups. CEF altered the membrane hydrophobicity, damaging membrane integrity after 30 cycles.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that high-dose, prolonged exposure is more effective for eliminating
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.