ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
In Vitro and In Silico Wound-Healing Activity of Two Cationic Peptides Derived from Cecropin D in
Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unlocking New Bioactive Peptides from Coffee Pulp: A Metagenomics and AI-Driven Discovery Paradigm.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Peptides in wound healing: A comprehensive review of their roles, challenges, and hydrogel-based delivery systems.EXCLI journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic wounds pose a significant public health challenge due to high treatment costs and the limited efficacy of current therapies. This study aims to evaluate the in vitro wound-healing activity and in silico interactions of two antimicrobial cationic peptides, derived from
methodsTwo peptides were tested: a long peptide (∆M2, 39 amino acids) and a short peptide (CAMP-CecD, 18 amino acids). Their cytotoxicity, as well as their effects on fibroblast proliferation and migration, were assessed using Detroit 551 cells. In parallel, molecular docking studies were conducted with AutoDock Vina to predict the binding affinities of these peptides to the key receptors involved in wound healing: the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the transforming growth factor beta receptor (TGFRβ2), and the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR).
resultsIn vitro assays showed that the short peptide exhibited lower cytotoxicity and significantly enhanced cell proliferation and migration, leading to a greater percentage of gap closure compared to the long peptide. A docking analysis revealed binding affinities of -6.7, -7.2, and -5.6 kcal/mol for VEGFR, EGFR, and TGFRβ2, respectively, with the RMSD values below 2 Å, indicating stable binding interactions.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that the structure and cationic charge of the short peptide facilitate robust interactions with growth factor receptors, enhancing re-epithelialization and tissue regeneration. Consequently, this peptide is a promising candidate ligand for the treatment of chronic wounds and associated infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.