ReviewBiomolecules2025
Transcription-Coupled Nucleotide Excision Repair: A Faster Solution or the Only Option?
Review in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment and detection of nucleotide excision repair capability in human cells: a critical review of current functional methods.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Exploring the Role of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Mediating Cisplatin Resistance in Glioma/Glioblastoma Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A functional map of phosphoprotein phosphatase regulation identifies an evolutionarily conserved reductase for the catalytic metal ions.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Integrating Structural, Biochemical, and Cellular Perspectives on the TFIIH Helicases XPB and XPD.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Transcription-Coupled Repair Promotes the Retention of Mutations in Coding Regions During Replication Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Molecular Basis of Persister Awakening and Lag-Phase Recovery inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Expanding the landscape of nucleotide excision repair disorders: from discovery to therapy.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A branch of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway, transcription-coupled repair (TCR or TC-NER) specifically operates on the template DNA strand of actively transcribed genes. Initiated by stalling of elongating RNA polymerase complexes at damaged sites, TC-NER has historically been viewed as "accelerated repair", arguably necessary for the maintenance of vital transcription function. Conversely, the conventional "global genome" (GG-NER) mechanism, operating throughout the genome, is usually regarded as a much slower process, even though it has long been found that differences in repair kinetics between transcribed DNA and the rest of the genome are not manifested for all structural types of DNA damage. Considering that damage detection is the rate-limiting step of overall repair reactions in most cases and that the mechanisms of the initial recognition of modified DNA structure are fundamentally different between TC-NER and GG-NER, it is suggestive to attribute the observed kinetic differences to different damage spectra recognized by the two pathways. This review summarizes current knowledge on the differential requirements of TC-NER and GG-NER towards specific damage types, based on their structural rather than spatial characteristics, and highlights some common features of DNA modifications repaired preferentially or exclusively by TC-NER, while evading other repair mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.