Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40723895›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2025

Three-Dimensional Models of Implantation Using Human Stem Cells: Scientific Insights and Broader Considerations.

Megan Munsie, Jock K Findlay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Megan MunsieStem Cell Medicine Theme, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3588-8321
Jock K FindlayCentre for Endocrinology & Reproductive Health, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8025-5799

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to model the earliest stages of human embryonic development in vitro using pluripotent stem cells offers researchers new ways to understand and interrogate the intricacies of implantation. It also raises important ethical and regulatory considerations, both those common to research involving human embryos, as well as those unique to stem cell-based embryo and endometrial models. This review examines the underpinning scientific discoveries that have led to the development of this rapidly expanding area of research, and how three-dimensional embryo models could be employed in advancing assisted reproductive technologies and understanding implantation failure. Importantly, we also discuss the ethical and legal implications and explore various governance models that have been proposed to foster responsibility and innovation in this area of research. Given the heightened interest in the scientific community on this topic, we finish on the question of how and when to involve the public in the development of this technology and its regulation.

Indexed as

Embryo ImplantationModels, BiologicalPluripotent Stem CellsHumansblastoidsembryo researchethicsimplantationpolicypublic engagementregulationstem cell-based embryo models

Identifiers

PMID40723895
PMCPMC12292578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.