ArticleBiomolecules2025
Role of Charge Density of Polycations in DNA Complexation and Condensation.
Article in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polycationic gene vectors have been studied extensively for gene delivery, and the charge density of polycations plays a pivotal role in condensing nucleic acids. Recently, we have synthesized two kinds of polycations with varied charge densities: poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (denoted as A100) and a copolymer of 2-(tetramethyleneimino)ethyl methacrylate and 2-(diisopropyl-amino)ethyl methacrylate with a 3:1 feed ratio (denoted as B75D25). Despite its lower charge density, B75D25-based vectors exhibit higher transfection efficiency than A100-based vectors, prompting the hypothesis that hydrophobic interactions, rather than solely high charge density, enhance DNA complexation and gene delivery. This study aims to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying these differences using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to study the complexation of DNA with B75D25s and A100s. Our simulations reveal that DNA is quite uniformly covered by B75D25s, and the complexation is not only driven by the electrostatic attraction with DNA but more importantly by the hydrophobic interactions among B75D25s. In contrast, only a small fraction of A100s bind to DNA, which is due to the strong electrostatic repulsion among A100s. Our results reveal the contribution of hydrophobic interactions to the complexation of low-charge-density B75D25s with DNA. These results suggest that high charge density may not be essential for DNA condensation and efficient gene delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.