ArticleBiomolecules2025
Identification of a Novel Antibacterial Function of Mammalian Calreticulin.
Article in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calreticulin is a highly conserved and multifunctional molecular chaperone ubiquitously expressed in humans and animals. Beyond its well-established roles in calcium homeostasis, protein folding, and immune regulation, recent studies in aquatic species have suggested a previously unrecognized antimicrobial function of calreticulin. These findings raise the question of whether calreticulin also exerts antibacterial activity in terrestrial mammals, which has not been systematically investigated to date. To address this knowledge gap, we successfully constructed and expressed recombinant goat calreticulin using the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.