Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40723810›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2025

Cell-Type Annotation for scATAC-Seq Data by Integrating Chromatin Accessibility and Genome Sequence.

Guo Wei, Long Wang, Yan Liu, Xiaohui Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guo WeiState Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210000, China.
Long WangState Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7067-0558
Yan LiuDepartment of Computer Science, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225100, China.
Xiaohui ZhangState Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4776-3924

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin using sequencing (scATAC-seq) technology enables single-cell resolution analysis of chromatin accessibility, offering critical insights into gene regulation, epigenetic heterogeneity, and cellular differentiation across various biological contexts. However, existing cell annotation methods face notable limitations. Cross-omics approaches, which rely on single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) as a reference, often struggle with data alignment due to fundamental differences between transcriptional and chromatin accessibility modalities. Meanwhile, intra-omics methods, which rely solely on scATAC-seq data, are frequently affected by batch effects and fail to fully utilize genomic sequence information for accurate annotation. To address these challenges, we propose scAttG, a novel deep learning framework that integrates graph attention networks (GATs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to capture both chromatin accessibility signals and genomic sequence features. By utilizing the nucleotide sequences corresponding to scATAC-seq peaks, scAttG enhances both the robustness and accuracy of cell-type annotation. Experimental results across multiple scATAC-seq datasets suggest that scAttG generally performs favorably compared to existing methods, showing competitive performance in single-cell chromatin accessibility-based cell-type annotation.

Indexed as

ChromatinSingle-Cell AnalysisDeep LearningGenomicsHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationNeural Networks, ComputerTransposasesChromatinTransposasesconvolutional neural networkscross-omicsgenomegraph attention networks

Identifiers

PMID40723810
PMCPMC12292130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.