Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40723757›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

The Use of Retrieval Practice in the Health Professions: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Michael J Serra, Althea N Kaminske, Cynthia Nebel, Kristen M Coppola

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael J SerraDepartment of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0481-3829
Althea N KaminskeDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0153-5552
Cynthia NebelDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3317-8708
Kristen M CoppolaDepartment of Psychiatry, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3640-773X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrieval practice, or the active recall of information from memory, is a highly effective learning strategy that strengthens memory and comprehension. This effect is robust and strongly backed by research in cognitive psychology. The health professions-including medicine, nursing, and dentistry-have widely embraced retrieval practice as a learning and study tool, particularly for course exams and high-stakes licensing exams. This state-of-the-art review examines the historical development, current applications, and future directions for the use of retrieval practice in health professions education. While retrieval-based learning has long been used informally in these fields, its formal recognition as a scientifically supported study method gained momentum in the early 2000s and then saw a surge in both research interest and curricular adoption between 2010 and 2025. This historical review explores the key factors driving this growth, such as its alignment with assessment-driven education and the increasing availability of third-party study resources that rely on retrieval practice as a guiding principle. Despite its proven benefits for learning, however, barriers persist to its adoption by students, including in the health professions. This article discusses strategies for overcoming these challenges and for enhancing retrieval practice integration into health professions curricula.

Indexed as

applied cognitive psychologyhealth professions educationretrieval practiceself-regulated learningtest-enhanced learning

Identifiers

PMID40723757
PMCPMC12292765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.