Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40723698›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Microeconomic Losses Due to Intimate Partner Violence Against Women (IPVAW): Three Scenarios Based on Accounting Methodology Approach.

Elena Mañas-Alcón, María-Teresa Gallo-Rivera, Luis-Felipe Rivera-Galicia, Óscar Montes-Pineda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elena Mañas-AlcónInstitute of Economic and Social Analysis, Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism, University of Alcalá, 28802 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
María-Teresa Gallo-RiveraInstitute of Economic and Social Analysis, Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism, University of Alcalá, 28802 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1566-5753
Luis-Felipe Rivera-GaliciaInstitute of Economic and Social Analysis, Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism, University of Alcalá, 28802 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4271-3266
Óscar Montes-PinedaInstitute of Economic and Social Analysis, Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism, University of Alcalá, 28802 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.

Funding

Delegación del Gobierno contra la Violencia de Genero. Gobierno de España 300322EAS003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article thoroughly examines the multidimensional consequences of intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) and estimates the monetary costs associated with this kind of violence in Spain for 2022. Based on the accounting model approach, three alternative scenarios are proposed to quantify the direct tangible costs of IPVAW from a microeconomic perspective. Each scenario considers the out-of-pocket expenditures and the opportunity cost of lost income due to IPVAW, borne by the survivor women, their families and relatives, the public sector, and the private organizations. The study utilizes microdata from the latest Spanish Macro-survey on Violence Against Women, conducted in 2019 by the Government Office against Gender-Based Violence (Spanish Government). Results show the costs ranging from EUR 1.38 billion (the most conservative estimate) to EUR 3.01 billion (the highest estimate). Further research is needed to deepen understanding of the mechanisms by which violence affects the various domains and agents of society.

Indexed as

economic impactsintimate partner violence against women (IPVAW)Spain

Identifiers

PMID40723698
PMCPMC12292621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.