ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Perceiving Speaker's Certainty: The Interaction Among Subjectivity of Statement, Evidential Markers, and Evidence Strength.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidentiality is a linguistic category whose primary meaning is the source of information, which is generally divided into firsthand perception, hearsay, and inference. Evidential markers are the linguistic devices that indicate information sources. While considerable studies have revealed that evidential markers have an effect on the perceived speaker's certainty, no comparison on such an effect has been carried out in subjective and objective sentences. Moreover, with evidential markers and evidence strength both influencing the speaker's certainty, their relationship when used in collocation has not been investigated. This article examined, in two experiments, the intertwinement of inferential markers, subjectivity, and evidence strength in affecting the perceived speaker's certainty in Chinese. Participants were asked to judge the perceived speaker's certainty in sentences with and without inferential markers and also in sentences with different degrees of evidence strength in subjective and objective conditions. Our results revealed that (i) subjective evaluations are conceived with a lower degree of the speaker's certainty than objective sentences; (ii) Chinese evidential markers change the perceived speaker's certainty in subjective and objective sentences; and (iii) evidence strength plays a role in subjective evaluations but not in objective sentences. Our results show the participants reasoning the subjective evaluation themselves based on the evidence, but adopting the speaker's evaluation on the objective situations. Overall, our study supported that inferential markers significantly lowered the perceived speaker's certainty, and reported the different effects of evidence strength in objective sentences and subjective evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.