ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Influence of Spatial Distance and Trade-Off Salience on Ethical Decision-Making: An Eye-Tracking Study Based on Embodied Cognition.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research based on the theory of embodied cognition has revealed that the vertical position of target information in space influences individuals' construal level, which in turn affects their ethical decision-making. However, previous studies have shown inconsistent effects of construal level on ethical decision-making, which may be moderated by factors such as the manipulation methods of construal level and the salience of trade-offs. This study examines how manipulating the vertical position (high/low) of target information in space-thereby altering perceived spatial distance-impacts ethical decision-making through the lens of embodied cognition, using eye-tracking technology. Experiment 1 isolated the effect of target verticality, while Experiment 2 introduced trade-off salience as an additional factor. Eye-tracking metrics in Experiment 1 revealed that lower target positions significantly increased late-stage cognitive processing difficulty. Experiment 2 demonstrated an interaction between target position and trade-off salience in ethical decision-making. These findings suggest that spatial positioning influences cognitive processing via construal level, with its effects on ethical decision-making moderated by trade-off cues. In summary, this study reveals the significant influence of trade-off salience as a contextual cue in individuals' ethical decision-making while also providing an embodied cognition perspective to inform decision behavior in human-computer interaction contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.