ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Transferable Modulation of Cognitive Control: The Cross-Task Role of Conflict Adaptation in Thematic Roles Assignment in Chinese.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conflict adaptation reflects the dynamic modulation of information processing by the cognitive control system following conflict detection. A central question in language processing research concerns whether control elicited by non-linguistic tasks generalizes across tasks to influence higher-order processes such as sentence comprehension. The present study employed color-word Stroop tasks of varying complexity and, in conjunction with eye-tracking technology, examined their cross-task regulatory effects of conflict adaptation on thematic role assignment in Chinese. Across two experiments, participants read sentences containing either congruent or conflicting thematic roles following Stroop trials with congruent or incongruent stimuli. The temporal dynamics of syntactic processing were captured via eye movement measures. Results indicated that both conflict tasks triggered cross-task conflict adaptation, as evidenced by accelerated syntactic processing and reduced regression behaviors when thematically incongruent sentences followed conflict trials. Notably, the more complex color-word Stroop task imposed greater demands on cognitive control resources and elicited earlier cognitive adaptation effects during comprehension. Theoretically, these findings extend conflict monitoring theory to the domain of language processing, demonstrating that cognitive control mechanisms contribute to real-time syntactic parsing. Methodologically, the use of eye-tracking to examine thematic role assignment provides fine-grained empirical evidence for the interaction between domain-general control and language-specific processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.