ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Cross-Sectional Analysis of Factors Predicting Food Assistance Stigma.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diabetes Nutrition Education and A Food Security Resource for American Indian and Alaska Native Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot and Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of nutrition education and behavior · 2026Trial
- A Review of Indian-Based Drones in the Agriculture Sector: Issues, Challenges, and Solutions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The stigma associated with food assistance can be a barrier to resolving food insecurity. Self-reliance expectations likely contribute to this stigma. Aim: This cross-sectional study identified factors that predict perceptions of food assistance stigma. Demographics (age, sex, race, and ethnicity) were collected, and food assistance stigma (Food Resource Acceptability) and self-reliance (Self-Reliance Scale) were measured via REDCap questionnaires from 531 online participants. The research volunteer repository, Research Match, was used for recruitment. Multiple regression was conducted to determine food assistance stigma predictors. Older age, being male, and reporting higher self-reliance significantly predicted the likelihood of stigmatizing food assistance. The social expectation of self-reliance in adulthood contributes to an assigned and anticipated stigma associated with accepting food assistance. This stigma permeates many regions, particularly the United States, and likely contributes to unresolved food insecurity despite the availability of multiple food assistance resources. Future qualitative research should be conducted among older individuals and males with high levels of self-reliance to gain a deeper understanding of how food assistance stigma could be lessened so that appropriate stigma reduction interventions could be tested among this target group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.