A Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis of the Antisocial Process Screening Device.

Meng-Cheng Wang, Jiaxin Deng, Xintong Zhang, Jinghui Liang, Yiyun Shou

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meng-Cheng WangDepartment of Psychology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.

Jiaxin DengDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6783-3563

Xintong ZhangDepartment of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China.

Jinghui LiangSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2740-6249

Yiyun ShouSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore 117549, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD) is one of the most widely used instruments for assessing psychopathic traits, the reliability estimates of the APSD show great heterogeneity across different studies. This investigation evaluated the reliability of the APSD using a reliability generalization meta-analytic technique across 158 studies (

Indexed as

antisocial process screening devicejuvenile psychopathymeta-analysisreliability generalization

Identifiers

PMID40723644

DOI10.3390/bs15070860

PMCPMC12292449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.