How Do Internal and External Control Factors Affect Cyberbullying? Partial Test of Situational Action Theory.

This study attempts to provide a comprehensive explanation for cybercrimes, with emphasis on cyberbullying, by applying situational action theory (SAT). Various hypotheses regarding the motivational and moral dimensions of cyberbullying are presented. Specifically, the interaction effects between motivational and moral factors, such as individual morality and environmental factors of differential association with cyberbullying peers, are examined. Moreover, the roles of self-control and deterrence are investigated as internal and external control factors in situations where conflicts arise between an individual's morality and the moral rules of their environment. The findings of this study support the assertions of SAT and demonstrate significant interaction effects between cyberbullying victimization and moral factors. Furthermore, consistent with SAT's discussion on conflicts in the moral dimension, this study reveals that self-control functions as a control factor in situations where individuals possess high morality but are confronted with high levels of differential association with cyberbullying peers; however, the argument that deterrence operates in situations of low differential association with cyberbullying peers and low individual morality is not supported. Despite the partial verification of SAT, this theory is generally endorsed and offers utility in explaining cyberbullying.