Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40723579›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Animal Welfare Problems in Sheep Farming: A Current Overview for Germany Based on Surveys of Veterinary Offices and the Evaluation of Publicly Accessible Court Cases.

Svenja Niethammer, Sarah Schmid, Hannah Hümmelchen, Axel Wehrend, Henrik Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Svenja NiethammerVeterinary Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Neonatology, Justus Liebig University, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Sarah SchmidVeterinary Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Neonatology, Justus Liebig University, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Hannah HümmelchenVeterinary Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Neonatology, Justus Liebig University, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Axel WehrendVeterinary Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Neonatology, Justus Liebig University, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Henrik WagnerVeterinary Clinic for Reproductive Medicine and Neonatology, Justus Liebig University, 35392 Giessen, Germany.

Funding

Federal Office for Food and Agriculture 28N 4 052 02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to provide an overview of the most frequent animal welfare cases documented by the authorities involved in sheep farming in Germany. A questionnaire with 26 questions was developed and sent to all German veterinary offices (supervisory authorities). Furthermore, publicly available court decisions on animal welfare cases over the last 30 years were consulted and analyzed. Approximately 18.1% (n = 71) of all veterinary authorities participated in the survey. The most frequently reported animal welfare cases included inadequate water supply (n = 63) and a lack of weather protection (n = 60). Other common issues were lameness (n = 56) and poor shearing management (n = 52). A total of 52 animal welfare cases presented in courts were found in the online search. The most common problems were nutrition (50%), water supply (34.6%), weather protection (32.7%), and shearing management (21.2%). These results provide information on the areas of sheep farming in which animal welfare violations occur most frequently. Based on these results, conclusions can be drawn regarding the development of preventive measures.

Indexed as

animal welfaresheep farmingsmall ruminantsveterinary

Identifiers

PMID40723579
PMCPMC12291943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.