ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Touchscreen Tasks for Cognitive Testing in Domestic Goats (
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- On the (limited) use of touchscreen-based behavioural and cognitive research with dogs: potential causes and future directions.Animal cognition · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cognition of large farm animals is important for understanding how cognitive abilities are shaped by evolution and domestication. Valid testing methods are needed with the development of cognitive studies in more species. Here, a step-by-step method for training four naïve domestic goats to use a touchscreen in cognitive tests is described. The goats made accurate touches smoothly after training. Follow-up tests were conducted to confirm that they could do cognitive tests on a touchscreen. In the pilot test of odd-item search, all the goats had above-chance level performances in some conditions. In the subsequent odd-item search tasks using multiple novel stimulus sets, one goat could achieve the criterion and complete several stages, and the results showed a learning effect. These suggest a potential ability to learn the rule of odd-item search. Not all goats could pass the criteria, and there were failures in the transfer, indicating a perceptual strategy rather than using the odd-item search rule. The experiment confirmed that goats could use the touchscreen testing system for cognitive tasks and demonstrated their approaches in tackling this problem. We also hope that these training methods will help future studies training and testing naïve animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.