Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40723558›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Role of a Precision Biotic Fed to Dekalb White Laying Hens at Peak Production.

ElsiAnna Rodewald, Brooke Jasek, Li Zhang, Stacey Roberts, Cristiano Bortoluzzi, Pratima Adhikari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

ElsiAnna RodewaldDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-5702-2652
Brooke Jasekdsm-firmenich, Animal Nutrition and Health, North America, Belvidere, NJ 07823, USA.
Li ZhangDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3933-5794
Stacey RobertsVersova Management, Sioux Center, IA 51250, USA.
Cristiano Bortoluzzidsm-firmenich, Animal Nutrition and Health, 4303 Kaiseraugst, Switzerland.
Pratima AdhikariDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7108-389X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of two levels of a precision biotic (PB) within a reduced CP diet for performance, digestibility, and blood biomarkers in Dekalb White laying hens from 24 to 42 weeks of age. A total of four diets were fed: (1) an industry-standard positive control (PC) diet with a formulated CP level of 17.5%; (2) a negative control (NC) diet with a formulated CP level of 15.5%; (3) NC with 0.5 kg/ton PB (NC+PB1); (4) NC with 0.7 kg/ton PB (NC+PB2). The NC diet decreased hen-day egg production compared to the PC diet, and supplementation with both levels of PB led to intermediate levels of production. There was a similar trend for the feed conversion ratio (FCR), measured in kilograms of feed per dozen eggs. Feed cost was lower in the reduced CP diets compared to the PC. Apparent total tract digestibility was decreased with PB supplementation without differences in apparent ileal digestibility. The increased plasma uric acid levels in the NC+PB2 group suggest a shift in protein metabolism toward higher efficiency in ammonia detoxification. While more research is needed on PB, this research suggests that supplementation with PB in laying hens could potentially improve performance parameters.

Indexed as

egg massfeed conversionhen–day egg productionlaying henprecision biotic

Identifiers

PMID40723558
PMCPMC12291897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.