ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Well-Being Indicators in Autistic Children and Therapy Dogs During a Group Intervention: A Pilot Study.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The neural and physiological mechanisms of Animal-Assisted Interventions (AAI): A systematic review and integrated framework.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2026Review
- Integrated Canine-Assisted Services and Art Therapy in Prison: Pilot Study of Animal Well-Being Aspects and Its Impact on Inmate Critical Events.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal-assisted services (AAS) have been shown in multiple studies to improve a range of human psychological and physical health benefits. The aim of this pilot study is to investigate simultaneously two psycho-physiological indicators of the valence of interactions in the context of dog-assisted activities in children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Ten children and four dogs experienced in AAS were involved, lasting 90 days, in weekly one-hour sessions. Before and after each session, saliva was taken in both dogs and children for determination of salivary oxytocin and cortisol levels. In addition, at the end of the program, a questionnaire was administered to both parents and dog handlers to assess the impact of AAS in children and dogs. Our results revealed no statistically significant change in cortisol and oxytocin levels in dogs enrolled throughout the sessions, while an increasing trend was noted for salivary oxytocin in 50% of the dogs and for salivary cortisol in all dogs at the end of the AAS, when compared to the pre-AAS. Salivary cortisol measurement in children with an autistic neurotype highlighted a statistically significant increase at the end of the AAS when compared to the pre-AAS, but this was not observed for oxytocin level evaluations. Regarding the perception of the children's parents about the effects of the program, our data reported an improvement in sociability of the children in 100 percent of the cases. Furthermore, dog handlers reported an absence of signs of stress in their dogs during the sessions. Although the perceived effectiveness and quality of AAS has been demonstrated in the literature, the need to carefully select the dogs involved, considering their skills and needs, is critical to ensure their well-being in various therapeutic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.