Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40723485›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Lateralised Behavioural Responses of Chickens to a Threatening Human and a Novel Environment Indicate Fearful Emotions.

Amira A Goma, Clive J C Phillips

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amira A GomaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21944, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-7859-5137
Clive J C PhillipsCurtin University Sustainability Policy Institute, Curtin University, Kent St., Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1926-6357

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The demeanour of a human during an interaction with an animal may influence the animal's emotional response. We investigated whether the emotional responses of laying hens to a threatening or neutral human and a novel environment were lateralised, from which their emotional state can be inferred. Twenty-five DeKalb white laying hens reared in furnished cages under environmentally controlled conditions were individually assessed for their responses to these stimuli. They were contained in a box before emerging into an arena with a threatening human, who attempted direct eye contact with the bird and had their hands raised towards it, or a neutral person, who had no eye contact and sat with their hands on their knees. When initially placed in the box adjacent to the test arena, birds that remained in the box used their left eye more than their right eye, and they showed evidence of nervousness, with many head changes, neck stretching, and vocalisation. Birds showed lateralised behaviour in both the box and arena. Birds entering the arena with the threatening person used their left eye (connected to the right brain hemisphere) more than their right eye, usually with their body less vertical, and were more likely to be standing than sitting, compared with those viewing the neutral person. This confirms the bird's interpretation of the person as threatening, with left eye/right brain hemisphere processing of flight or fight situations. We conclude that lateralised responses of chickens suggest that a threatening person is viewed more fearfully than a neutral person. However, further investigation is required with a larger sample of birds to strengthen these findings and enhance the generalisability of behavioural responses.

Indexed as

birdsbrain hemisphereemotionshumannovelwelfare

Identifiers

PMID40723485
PMCPMC12291842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.