ArticleCancers2025
Enhancing Patient Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy: Integration of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes and Artificial Intelligence-Driven Oncology Care Using Large Language Models.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Intelligent Support for Radiotherapy: A Review of Clinical Applications for Large Language Models.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundElectronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) enable real-time symptom monitoring and early intervention in oncology. Large language models (LLMs), when combined with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), offer scalable Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven education tailored to individual patient needs. However, few studies have examined the feasibility and clinical impact of integrating ePRO with LLM-RAG feedback during radiotherapy in high-toxicity settings such as head and neck cancer.
methodsThis prospective observational study enrolled 42 patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy from January to December 2024. Patients completed ePRO entries twice weekly using a web-based platform. Following each entry, an LLM-RAG system (Gemini 1.5-based) generated real-time educational feedback using National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and institutional resources. Primary outcomes included percentage weight loss and treatment interruption days. Statistical analyses included
resultsPatients had a mean age of 53.6 years and submitted an average of 8.0 ePRO entries. Frequent ePRO users (≥6 entries) had significantly less weight loss (4.45% vs. 7.57%,
conclusionsIntegrating LLM-RAG feedback with ePRO systems is feasible and may enhance symptom control, treatment continuity, and patient engagement in head and neck cancer radiotherapy. Further studies are warranted to validate the clinical benefits of AI-supported ePRO platforms in routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.