ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
False-Positive and False-Negative MRD Results in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Navigating Between Scylla and Charybdis (Brief Review and Clinical Experience).
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesAcute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common malignant disease in children. Contemporary antitumor treatment protocols provide long-term survival rates in over 90% of patients with ALL. High effectiveness of the treatment has been achieved as a result of chemotherapy optimization, use of targeted drugs, up-to-date genetic information, and detection of minimal residual disease (MRD). Current highly sensitive methods for MRD detection have advantages and disadvantages, and the challenge is to distinguish between false-positive and false-negative tests.
methodsA comprehensive search through MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect using the MRD-related keywords was performed, and included a final set of 72 academic articles.
resultsAt present, flow cytometry for MRD detection provides the necessary sensitivity of 10
conclusionsThe necessary ground for an adequate sensitivity of the MRD detection methods could ensure the fine line between false-positive and false-negative MRD results in patients with childhood ALL to develop an appropriate therapeutic strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.