ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Current Treatment Options for Children with Functional Constipation-What Is in the Pipeline?
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this review, we summarize current insights into the treatment of functional constipation (FC) in children. Constipation is a global issue in the pediatric population, with a prevalence of approximately 9.5%. Initial management involves a combination of non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions. However, a significant number of children continue to experience therapy-resistant FC despite optimal non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments. While studies on novel pharmacological options in children are limited, adult trials have shown promising results. New agents such as lubiprostone, prucalopride, linaclotide, and plecanatide have demonstrated improved outcomes compared to placebo or conventional therapies, particularly in increasing spontaneous bowel movements. Neurostimulation presents an additional treatment modality. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation appears to be a promising new option, offering high treatment satisfaction and a favorable safety profile with a low rate of severe adverse events. For children who do not respond to optimal conservative therapy, the impact on quality of life can be substantial. In such cases, surgical interventions may be considered, including intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injections, antegrade continence enema surgery, and, in severe cases, colonic resection or a diverting ostomy. The choice of surgical treatment remains a subject of ongoing debate. Therapy-resistant FC in children is a complex and impactful condition. An individualized, stepwise approach is essential, with surgical options such as colonic resection reserved as a last resort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.