Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40722885›Full record

ReviewAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

CRISPR/Cas9 and iPSC-Based Therapeutic Approaches in Alzheimer's Disease.

Ivana Raffaele, Giovanni Luca Cipriano, Ivan Anchesi, Salvatore Oddo, Serena Silvestro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ivana RaffaeleIRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo", Via Provinciale Palermo, Contrada Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3999-0286
Giovanni Luca CiprianoIRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo", Via Provinciale Palermo, Contrada Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0823-1455
Ivan AnchesiIRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo", Via Provinciale Palermo, Contrada Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy.
Salvatore OddoDepartment of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Viale F. Stagno d'Alcontres 31, 98166 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7304-7430
Serena SilvestroIRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo", Via Provinciale Palermo, Contrada Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3846-0785

Funding

Ministero della Salute RRC-2025-23686388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD), the leading cause of dementia, remains poorly understood despite decades of intensive research, which continues to hinder the development of effective treatments. As a complex multifactorial disorder, AD lacks a cure to halt the progressive neurodegeneration, and the precise mechanisms underlying its onset and progression remain elusive, limiting therapeutic options. Due to the challenges of studying neuronal cells in vivo, technologies such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) and human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are key for identifying therapeutic targets, although they face technical and ethical hurdles in their early stages. CRISPR/Cas9 and hiPSCs are promising for disease modeling and therapy, but off-target effects and the complexity of gene editing in the brain limit their use. CRISPR technology enables specific genetic modifications in key AD-related genes, such as

Indexed as

agingAlzheimer’s diseaseCRISPR/Cas9genome editingneuroinflammationoxidative stressstem cell

Identifiers

PMID40722885
PMCPMC12291668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.