ReviewBiomedicines2025
Writing the Future: Artificial Intelligence, Handwriting, and Early Biomarkers for Parkinson's Disease Diagnosis and Monitoring.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Transition and Mental Health in School Settings: Does Handwriting Still Matter? A Multidisciplinary Perspective.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The future digital outpatient clinic for movement disorders: from technological innovation to ethical and systemic implementation-a position paper.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Clinically Deployable Handwriting Biomarkers of Parkinson's Disease via Multiscale Attention and Bayesian-Genetic Optimization.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Multitype hand writing as a digital marker for Parkinson's disease.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2026Article
- Essential Tremor Severity Assessment Using Handwriting Analysis and Machine Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Effect of Data Leakage and Feature Selection on Machine Learning Performance for Early Parkinson's Disease Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that impairs motor function, including the fine motor control required for handwriting. Traditional diagnostic methods often lack sensitivity and objectivity in the early stages, limiting opportunities for timely intervention. There is a growing need for non-invasive, accessible tools capable of capturing subtle motor changes that precede overt clinical symptoms. Among early PD manifestations, handwriting impairments such as micrographia have shown potential as digital biomarkers. However, conventional handwriting analysis remains subjective and limited in scope. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) enable automated analysis of handwriting dynamics, such as pressure, velocity, and fluency, collected via digital tablets and smartpens. These tools support the detection of early-stage PD, monitoring of disease progression, and assessment of therapeutic response. This paper highlights how AI-enhanced handwriting analysis provides a scalable, non-invasive method to support diagnosis, enable remote symptom tracking, and personalize treatment strategies in PD. This approach integrates clinical neurology with computer science and rehabilitation, offering practical applications in telemedicine, digital health, and personalized medicine. By capturing dynamic features often missed by traditional assessments, AI-based handwriting analysis contributes to a paradigm shift in the early detection and long-term management of PD, with broad relevance across neurology, digital diagnostics, and public health innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.